WebThornton and Raffin (1978) found that nearly half (2,057) of their 4,120 veterans with hearing loss had scores of 90% or better on the same test. Runge and Hosford-Dunn … Web- Thornton and Raffin - Bionomial distribution model; They investigated the critical differences between one score and a retest score that would be necessary for those scores to be considered statistically significant. Their findings showed that with an increasing set size, variability decreased. It would seem that more items are better.
Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using ...
WebThe performance of 3426 subjects on 100-word lists from Northwestern University Auditory Test #6 was analyzed to determine the application of a binomial model previously suggested by Thornton and Raffin (1978). It was found that the critical differences based on this model can be used to describe ac … WebTable 1 lists the lower and upper limits of the 95% critical differences based on Thornton and Raffin (1978) binomial model. The step size of the scores in this table is 5 percentage points ... british library gawain manuscript
Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable
WebWord recognition scores were analyzed with a table of confidence levels generated by Thornton and Raffin that determined the probability of differences between word … WebOct 27, 2024 · We then looked for the number of items that produced approximate 5% of data points beyond the critical difference limits. This analysis indicated that the binomial model (Thornton & Raffin, 1978) with n of 65 for the 1-list condition and 130 for the 2-list condition best described the variability of the CMnBio sentences. WebNov 1, 2007 · Although such a table has been available for nearly 30 years (A. R. Thornton & M. J. M. Raffin, 1978), the earlier table was constructed by calculation and used an … british library goblin market